Skip to main content
TrustRadius
OpenText SiteScope

OpenText SiteScope
Formerly Micro Focus SiteScope

Overview

What is OpenText SiteScope?

OpenText's SiteScope is an agentless application performance monitoring tool with hybrid support across a variety of systems and vendors. Sitescope also offers automated workflow and incident identification and remediation capabilities, and rapid installation-to-monitoring processes.

Read more
Recent Reviews

TrustRadius Insights

Customization Options: SiteScope offers a wide range of customization options, including custom monitors with custom thresholds, timing, …
Continue reading
Read all reviews

Popular Features

View all 12 features
  • Threshold alerts (6)
    8.9
    89%
  • Application dependency mapping and thresholding (6)
    8.8
    88%
  • Out-of-the box templates to monitor applications (6)
    8.7
    87%
  • Application monitoring (6)
    6.1
    61%
Return to navigation

Pricing

View all pricing
N/A
Unavailable

What is OpenText SiteScope?

OpenText's SiteScope is an agentless application performance monitoring tool with hybrid support across a variety of systems and vendors. Sitescope also offers automated workflow and incident identification and remediation capabilities, and rapid installation-to-monitoring processes.

Entry-level set up fee?

  • No setup fee

Offerings

  • Free Trial
  • Free/Freemium Version
  • Premium Consulting/Integration Services

Would you like us to let the vendor know that you want pricing?

5 people also want pricing

Alternatives Pricing

What is GitLab?

GitLab DevSecOps platform enables software innovation by aiming to empower development, security, and operations teams to build better software, faster. With GitLab, teams can create, deliver, and manage code quickly and continuously instead of managing disparate tools and scripts. GitLab helps…

What is IBM Instana?

Instana, an IBM company since the December 2020 acquisition, provides APM services for SOA, microservices, containerized applications and Kubernetes, and cloud native applications, as well as discovery and monitoring for IT assets.

Return to navigation

Features

Application Performance Management

Application performance management software monitors software to ensure performance and availability

8.1
Avg 7.6
Return to navigation

Product Details

What is OpenText SiteScope?

OpenText's SiteScope is an agentless application performance monitoring tool with hybrid support across a variety of systems and vendors. Sitescope also offers automated workflow and incident identification and remediation capabilities, and rapid installation-to-monitoring processes.

OpenText SiteScope Competitors

OpenText SiteScope Technical Details

Operating SystemsUnspecified
Mobile ApplicationNo

Frequently Asked Questions

OpenText's SiteScope is an agentless application performance monitoring tool with hybrid support across a variety of systems and vendors. Sitescope also offers automated workflow and incident identification and remediation capabilities, and rapid installation-to-monitoring processes.

Nagios XI, Zabbix, and Datadog are common alternatives for OpenText SiteScope.

Reviewers rate Virtualization monitoring highest, with a score of 9.1.

The most common users of OpenText SiteScope are from Enterprises (1,001+ employees).
Return to navigation

Comparisons

View all alternatives
Return to navigation

Reviews and Ratings

(25)

Community Insights

TrustRadius Insights are summaries of user sentiment data from TrustRadius reviews and, when necessary, 3rd-party data sources. Have feedback on this content? Let us know!

Customization Options: SiteScope offers a wide range of customization options, including custom monitors with custom thresholds, timing, polling, and more. Several users have praised the extensive customization capabilities of SiteScope, allowing them to tailor the monitoring system to their specific needs.

Alerting Capabilities: Users appreciate the ability to receive specific and data-filled alerts through email and text message capabilities. They also like that SiteScope allows for the inclusion of variables within these messages to provide a clear understanding of the alert. Many reviewers have mentioned this as a valuable feature that helps them stay informed about critical events in real-time.

Ease of Use: Despite its depth of customization options, SiteScope is considered easy to use by many users. They mention a short learning curve and feel that they can quickly master the system. This user-friendly interface has been highlighted by several reviewers as an advantage when it comes to effectively managing and monitoring their applications.

Limitation in monitoring physical components: Some users have expressed dissatisfaction with SiteScope as it does not monitor certain physical components such as power supplies, failed hard drives, and array controllers. This limitation may not meet the user's monitoring needs.

Lack of cascading alerting: Several reviewers have mentioned that the alerting system in SiteScope is an all or nothing type and does not offer the capability to configure alerts in a tiered manner. This lack of cascading alerting can be limiting for users who require more flexibility in their alert setup.

Absence of mobile application: Users have pointed out that SiteScope does not have a mobile application, which limits the options for receiving alerts to email and text messages unless integrated with another application. The absence of a dedicated mobile app may be seen as a drawback by some customers.

Users of the software have made several recommendations based on their experiences.

First, many users recommend the software as a reliable and stable solution for workflow automation and performance monitoring. They have found it to be an essential tool in managing their infrastructure and monitoring systems. With its active functionality, it has proven to be a valuable asset in their daily operations.

Second, some users suggest that Micro Focus is a highly demanded tool in the market for experienced individuals. They recommend starting with this software as a stepping stone for a career in automation and believe it offers a reliable future.

Lastly, users highly recommend the software as a good enterprise product for monitoring production-grade applications. They advise implementing it alongside the OMi solution for optimal results. However, some users also suggest considering alternate solutions, indicating that there may be other options worth exploring.

Attribute Ratings

Reviews

(1-2 of 2)
Companies can't remove reviews or game the system. Here's why
Score 7 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
We looked at introducing it as a general overview monitoring system. We started out in the network area for simple monitoring of network bandwidth, ping and smnp monitoring. From there we plan to expand it to server monitoring; CPU, disk space, memory, and overall performance monitoring. Last for the virtualization and cloud monitoring. We have been in the virtualization area for years and slowly moving into the cloud.
  • SNMP monitoring.
  • Microsoft service monitoring.
  • URL failing authentication errors.
  • SNMP monitoring return null sometimes.
For a general overall monitoring purpose, SiteScope does it for you. SiteScope offers an overview in multiple areas, best used for helpdesk monitoring. Good insight for application, database, media, network, server, virtualization, and cloud. We setup a general monitor for our helpdesk with network and virtualization basic stats.
Application Performance Management (12)
60.83333333333333%
6.1
Application monitoring
60%
6.0
Database monitoring
60%
6.0
Threshold alerts
70%
7.0
Predictive capabilities
50%
5.0
Application performance management console
70%
7.0
Collaboration tools
60%
6.0
Out-of-the box templates to monitor applications
60%
6.0
Application dependency mapping and thresholding
70%
7.0
Virtualization monitoring
60%
6.0
Server availability and performance monitoring
60%
6.0
Server usage monitoring and capacity forecasting
60%
6.0
IT Asset Discovery
50%
5.0
  • Helpdesk monitoring.
  • Network monitoring from a basic benchmarking.
Like I've mentioned before, SiteScope is a basic overall monitoring tool used primarily for the helpdesk here at my company. We do not use it from a detail perspective in the networking area. SolarWinds is primarily for that since it is more detail oriented. Uptime is really only used for knowing whether sites are up so we've transitioned that to SiteScope. Splunk is advanced and needs a lot more attention to maintain.
Can't really answer this. Setup was easy and no support has really been used at this point.
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
We are using HP sitescope as one of the monitoring tool for alerts along with splunk. We use it along with shell scripts that will be triggered through Sitescope and send alerts based on the response. Splunk is not designed particularly for infrastructure monitoring and with Sitescope we have default monitoring for CPU processes, memory etc. We also do JVM monitoring with Sitescope which is difficult to do with splunk.
  • All the infrastructure monitoring things are preexisting and we don't need to set up anything additional when using HP Sitescope. We have monitors for ps, CPU, etc., for our application.
  • HP Sitescope can also run the custom scripts in our servers and send an alert based on the output. For example, we are running one custom script with HP sitescope to monitor large size files and send an alert if they exceed the threshold.
  • Sitescope will have logs as well which can then be forwarded to splunk to draw graphs in splunk for the dashboard. For example, ps is very expensive in splunk and it was disabled. So we are sending that stat from HP sitescope and have a splunk dashboard to show the memory of that process over time.
  • Sitescope is particularly used for infrastructure monitoring. Other kinds of monitors cannot be set using HP sitescope.
  • Sitescope cannot have graphs like splunk which is why we have splunk as well which is an additional cost for the company.
  • We can't have a direct regex operations on data inside HP sitescope. We need to have the logs placed as a single log and then do that.
HP sitescope is mostly used if we need infrastructure monitoring. And in most companies, we have many servers and need to monitor their health and so Sitescope is a good buy for all such scenarios. It is not very useful when we want to have dashboards and depictions based on the data from Sitescope. We can't index the logs and create regex operations from those logs like we do in other monitoring tools.
Application Performance Management (12)
75%
7.5
Application monitoring
80%
8.0
Database monitoring
60%
6.0
Threshold alerts
90%
9.0
Predictive capabilities
60%
6.0
Application performance management console
70%
7.0
Collaboration tools
70%
7.0
Out-of-the box templates to monitor applications
70%
7.0
Application dependency mapping and thresholding
80%
8.0
Virtualization monitoring
80%
8.0
Server availability and performance monitoring
80%
8.0
Server usage monitoring and capacity forecasting
70%
7.0
IT Asset Discovery
90%
9.0
  • Checking processes using a ps command and other indexing steps is very expensive in splunk.
  • Infrastructure monitoring is no more an issue for our company after getting HP sitescope.
Nagios can also do most of the things that HP sitescope can do, but HP sitescope is right on target when it comes to infrastructure monitoring and also cost effective which is why we selected HP sitescope. We also have teh iPhone and Android apps which are very useful for monitoring on mobile devices as well.
Return to navigation